A Sweet Briar College Learning Resource

H2O - The Mystery, Art, and Science of Water

WATER and the FLOODING RIVER
Professor Lincoln P. Brower


Flooding is a beneficial and renewing natural force

from
The Flooding River, A Study of Riverine Ecology
a film by L. P. Brower


In June, 1970 while I was Professor of Biology and teaching ecology at Amherst College, the Connecticut River Basin Coordinating Committee published a nine volume report weighing 25 pounds, entitled "Comprehensive water and related land resources investigation, Connecticut River Basin". The Plan was prepared under the chairmanship of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Agriculture, and Health, several New England States, the New England River Basin Commission, etc. and was one of scores of such plans for river ecosystems throughout the United States. A vaguely defined budget of 2 billion dollars was proposed to build 7 major dams and to consider the construction of 196 other dams on tributaries of the 11,250 square mile Connecticut River watershed.


image source

I, together with several environmentally concerned biology and geology colleagues from Hampshire College, The University of Massachusetts, Smith College, and the Massachusetts Audubon Society, organized a symposium and press conference at The University of Massachusetts that critiqued the plan and piqued the interest of the Connecticut Valley community. Shortly thereafter, we formed "The Connecticut River Ecology Action Corporation" and published the proceedings of the symposium (1). I then obtained support from the Rockefeller Foundation to produce a documentary film on the Connecticut River, The Flooding River, A Study of Riverine Ecology (2).


image source

The theme of The Flooding River was that the widely held assumption that flooding is ecologically harmful is simply incorrect. The film artistically developed an exactly opposite thesis: flooding is a beneficial and renewing natural event. River flooding is the principal force mediating fundamental biological and geological interactions. These, in turn, are responsible for producing and maintaining the rich biodiversity of the entire riverine ecosystem, including the plant and animal species in the headwaters and tributaries, the many floodplains and oxbow lakes, and the estuary, where the flood waters annually enrich the coastal marine environments.

The Flooding River was shown countless times to citizen groups up and down the Connecticut Valley, and in 1972 resulted in my receiving an environmental commendation from the Massachusetts Audubon Society. The film then won a major environmental film festival award. To date, not one of the proposed dams has been built on the Connecticut or its tributaries. In 1993 the beautiful West Branch of the Westfield River, one of the tributaries originally proposed to be dammed, was designated a National Wild and Scenic River, one of the few in eastern North America.

In 1972, The Flooding River was entered as legal evidence in the Environmental Defense Fund's (EDF) federal suit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps planned to channelize the Tombigbee River in Alabama and Mississippi, carve through the southern Appalachians, and join the Tombigbee to the Tennessee River, thereby effectively connecting the Gulf of Mexico with the St. Lawrence River. The Tombigbee is geologically the oldest river in the North America and has an extremely high biodiversity of fish, freshwater clams and other key aquatic animal groups and EDF considered it of great environmental significance. Unfortunately, the Corps used an effective maneuver of pitting so-called "equally competent expert witnesses" against each other. The result was that the judge dismissed all scientific testimony in the case. Ecological degradation of Tombigbee proceeded apace.

During the course of the Tombigbee trial, there was a destructive flood in Rapid City, South Dakota. As an expert witness I was asked if my position really could be justified, given the economic disaster and loss of life. Little did the seven lawyers who were cross-examining me realize that they had planted the seed for a film sequel. Two days later the seed germinated as the Corps flew me over the devastation along Rapid Creek in a Huey helicopter. It was obvious to me that the flood damage was a man-made result of poor planning and lack of building regulations. Then, in May 1973, the Mississippi River hit its highest historical flood level in St. Louis. I called the Environmental Defense Fund, left with Robie Hubley of The Massachusetts Audubon Society for St. Louis, and our second environmental film, Planning for Floods was assured. I wrote the script and designed the graphics, and EDF hired George Stoney (Professor of Film Science, New York University), to produce Planning for Floods. The film developed the theme that the Corps of Engineers' philosophy of channelization and dam building ultimately promoted greater economic damage and more likely loss of human life by creating a false sense of security, thereby encouraging people to build on "protected" floodplains.

Planning for Floods foretold that a larger flood would sooner or later occur, and, as we know, 1993 fulfilled the prediction. Hugh Downs' narration of my script is, almost verbatim, what we are currently hearing on National Public Radio and in the national press about future federal flood control policy. At my request in August 1993, EDF dredged out Planning for Floods (they had forgotten they had made the film, typifying our culture's lack of historical perspective) and by November had re-issued it in video format. On September 16, 1993, Joel Plagenz called from EDF to tell me that he had spoken with Vice President Albert Gore and was "astonished" that the Federal Government is using the language of Planning for Floods in discussing future U.S. flood control policy. Thus, under the current administration, there is a strong call for moving people and businesses out of the floodplain, investing less on new structural flood control projects, and relying more on natural marshes, oxbows, and agricultural fields to absorb and moderate flood flows. If this happens, major environmental and economic benefits should result.


image source

References:

  1. Brower, L.P., ed. 1971. Proceedings of a Symposium, "Scientists' View of the Connecticut River Basin Plan". The Conneticut River Ecology Action Corporation (CREAC), Hadley, Massachusetts. Pp. 24.

  2. Brower, L.P. 1972. The Flooding River, A Study in Riverine Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. 16 mm film, sound, color, 34 minutes.



CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PURPOSE SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS PARTICIPANTS


H20 - The Mystery, Art, and Science of Water
Chris Witcombe and Sang Hwang
Sweet Briar College